The NLS Forum curates pioneering research and current developments in the fields of law, public policy, social sciences and humanities.
Our work bridges academic scholarship, legal practice and
civil society discourse.
We present the University blog and five student journal blogs, where leading scholarship from around the world is edited by our faculty, researchers and students. To submit your work, please refer to the submission guidelines provided for each blog.
What Does Gig Work on Digital Platforms Guarantee: An Urban Safety Net or Precarity?
March 16, 2026
In the second piece in NLSIR's Special Blog Series entitled Beyond the Gig, Balaji Parthasarathy and Tony Mathew argue that comparing gig work on digital platforms with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA) is misleading because the MGNREGA guarantees 100 days of work and legal rights, while gig work offers no guaranteed wages, hours, or bargaining power. Despite claims that the gig economy provides flexible employment and acts like an urban safety net, evidence shows gig workers often face uncertain income, long working hours, and lack minimum-wage protections. Recent regulations like the Code on Social Security, 2020 and the Karnataka Platform Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Act, 2025 provide limited benefits but fail to address core issues such as wages, labour rights, and the structural power imbalance between platforms and workers.
The Copyright Play: AI, Section 52, and the Acts of Fair Dealing
March 15, 2026
Written as a five-act drama, this paper analyzes AI training under Section 52. It argues for recognizing tokenization as transformative research. It focuses on training process, that is distinct from generated output, and argues that it is a non-infringing necessity to encourage innovation.
Quantitative Thresholds, Qualitative Gaps: SEBI’s HVDLE Framework in Perspective
February 23, 2026
SEBI’s new consultation paper dated 27 October,2025, proposes to raise the High Value Debt Listed Entity (HVDLE) threshold from ₹1,000 crore to ₹5,000 crore marking a significant recalibration of India’s debt-market governance framework. Framed as a step toward ease of doing business, the proposal would exclude nearly 64% of existing HVDLEs from enhanced governance norms. This piece argues that repeated reliance on a purely quantitative trigger risks regulatory arbitrariness and uneven treatment of similarly situated issuers. Drawing comparative lessons from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, it proposes a composite, risk-based framework that integrates quantitative and qualitative criteria to better align regulatory intensity with systemic risk, investor protection, and market stability.
Poking the Tiger: The Supreme Court Rewrites India’s Treaty Entitlement Rules
March 11, 2026
The author examines the Supreme Court of India's 2026 decision in Tiger Global and its implications for the interaction between treaty entitlements and India's General Anti-Avoidance Rule. The judgment, it is argued, marks a decisive doctrinal shift from formal treaty compliance to a substance-over-form approach, reframing the 2016 Protocol's grandfathering clause from an inviolable guarantee to a rebuttable presumption subject to anti-avoidance scrutiny. By embedding GAAR principles into treaty interpretation, the Court subordinates legitimate expectations to domestic anti-abuse frameworks, ultimately conditioning treaty benefits on demonstrable commercial substance over mere formal compliance.