Regrettable or Fatal? Arbitrator Non-Disclosure Before the Delhi High Court

This piece argues that the Delhi High Court's Engineering Projects v. MSA Global ruling erroneously granted an anti-arbitration injunction based on an arbitrator's non-disclosure. The court mistakenly applied the low-threshold disclosure standard (ICC Art. 11) instead of the objective "justifiable doubts" challenge standard (ICC Art. 14) to find the proceedings "oppressive." This conflation, which disregards the ICC Court's own findings, represents a form of procedural hyper-vigilance that undermines party autonomy and international arbitral norms.

Viraj Thakur, Nida Adeel Mohammed

October 13, 2025
  • Arbitration

The Arbitrator You Didn’t Choose: Party Equality and Joinder in Adavya Projects

Saarthak Agarwal, Praveen Kumar Yadav

October 8, 2025
  • Constitutional Law
  • Technology Media Telecommunications

Thickening the “Chill”: Expanding the Chilling Effect Doctrine through Kunal Kamra v Union of India

Arnav Mathur

October 2, 2025
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy

Diluting Security: Part of the IBC’s Wise Design to Break Contracts

Yash Sinha

August 27, 2025
  • Arbitration
  • Corporate Law

Attributing Personal Liability to Drafters: A Doctrinal Incompatibility

Shubhankar Sharan, Arima Kaushal

August 22, 2025
  • Environmental Law

Environmental Impact Assessment & Solar Energy Projects in India: Solutions creating the same problems.

Chhaya Bhardwaj, Saksham Misra

July 28, 2025
  • Special Series: Courting the Climate Crisis

Two Avenues for Loss and Damage

Anirudh Sridhar

June 23, 2025
  • Special Series: Courting the Climate Crisis

From Prior to Post: A Shift to the Polluter Pays Principle Through Environmental Clearances

Ashwin Murthy

June 22, 2025
  • Interview
  • Special Series: Courting the Climate Crisis

NLSIR On Line#6: A Conversation with Arpitha Kodiveri on Governing Forests

June 20, 2025